In recent years, there have
been intense political battles regarding pension systems, and these arguments
will persist and only worsen. Many
readers of this website will have sharply divergent views from one another on
this topic, so I will do my best to present this in a rational economic
construct.
Governments on the federal,
state, and municipal levels have completely and systematically overpromised
pension benefits to current and retired employees. The mid-to-late 1990s witnessed significant
economic growth and stock market appreciation, which is unquestionably a good
thing, but unfortunately this outperformance set unrealistically high
expectations for future investment growth rates. Many politicians, who receive significant
campaign contributions and electoral support from public sector unions, were
incentivized to make pension plans more and more generous.
Unfortunately, investment
returns over the past 13 years have been quite paltry. Crucially, for the past four years and going
forward for at least the next couple, we have been in a protracted low interest
rate environment. This drives bond
yields lower, thereby making it exceedingly difficult for pension funds to
achieve investment targets without taking undue risks.
Nearly every state now finds
itself having promised way more in benefits than it can possibly deliver. As we have witnessed in California and other
high-tax states, trying to tax your way out of this problem ends up being
largely counterproductive, as businesses and higher-income earners end up
relocating to states like Texas and Florida which are relative tax havens. In this still-depressed economic environment,
states may be able to raise some revenue without suffering a significant
exodus, but not nearly enough to make up for the pension shortfall.
This leaves us with an
uncomfortable realization, but a realization nonetheless. Pension
reform isn’t a choice, it’s a necessity.
And the sooner states adopt pension reforms, mathematics proves that comparatively
small short-term sacrifices will be far preferable than having a bankrupted
system that cannot afford to make any payments to retirees.
The next article below
provides the math to back up this statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment